<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Officers should all have Tanks and Healers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.groupsofwords.com/2008/05/31/officers-should-all-have-tanks-and-healers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.groupsofwords.com/2008/05/31/officers-should-all-have-tanks-and-healers/</link>
	<description>in a wide variety of arrangements</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frijona</title>
		<link>http://www.groupsofwords.com/2008/05/31/officers-should-all-have-tanks-and-healers/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Frijona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 21:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.groupsofwords.com/?p=34#comment-38</guid>
		<description>My guild must be rather unusual, because we are often at a loss for DPS.  I'll often log on with tells of, "Fri!!  Can you DPS x instance?"  I know my GM is leveling a resto shaman and a prot pally for this reason.  I also started a Druid that will hopefully be a viable bear tank at some point (we are at a loss for tanks on occasion, which is why I've been known to VW tank easier instances--we seem to have a plethora of healers, though).  But I'm a slow, slow leveler!

Our guild has had a pattern of 1) a tank shows commitment and leadership abilities 2) we give the tank a leadership role, and 3) the tank gets frustrated with our slower progression and goes to a heavier raiding guild.  So, I understand having backups, but I'd rather the backups be other guild members who are currently taking an off-tank position.  We have one feral Druid who does quite well with instances, so at this point we'd like to send him on raids as an off-tank and get him geared up so he could take on the MT role if needed.  We want to get as many people who want to raid a chance to raid, which makes us different from other, heavier raiding guilds I suppose.

I'm not sure what the point of my comment is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guild must be rather unusual, because we are often at a loss for DPS.  I&#8217;ll often log on with tells of, &#8220;Fri!!  Can you DPS x instance?&#8221;  I know my GM is leveling a resto shaman and a prot pally for this reason.  I also started a Druid that will hopefully be a viable bear tank at some point (we are at a loss for tanks on occasion, which is why I&#8217;ve been known to VW tank easier instances&#8211;we seem to have a plethora of healers, though).  But I&#8217;m a slow, slow leveler!</p>
<p>Our guild has had a pattern of 1) a tank shows commitment and leadership abilities 2) we give the tank a leadership role, and 3) the tank gets frustrated with our slower progression and goes to a heavier raiding guild.  So, I understand having backups, but I&#8217;d rather the backups be other guild members who are currently taking an off-tank position.  We have one feral Druid who does quite well with instances, so at this point we&#8217;d like to send him on raids as an off-tank and get him geared up so he could take on the MT role if needed.  We want to get as many people who want to raid a chance to raid, which makes us different from other, heavier raiding guilds I suppose.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the point of my comment is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gowwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.groupsofwords.com/2008/05/31/officers-should-all-have-tanks-and-healers/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>gowwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 18:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.groupsofwords.com/?p=34#comment-37</guid>
		<description>That's what I do! But I figured that for the officer who doesn't know to covering the group roles for their guild, we'll start them off easy with just one group-friendly alt.
Altitis is wonderful by the way, both the &lt;a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Altitis" rel="nofollow"&gt;syndrome&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="http://altitis.treehuggers.info/" rel="nofollow"&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I do! But I figured that for the officer who doesn&#8217;t know to covering the group roles for their guild, we&#8217;ll start them off easy with just one group-friendly alt.<br />
Altitis is wonderful by the way, both the <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Altitis" rel="nofollow">syndrome</a> and the <a href="http://altitis.treehuggers.info/" >blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kikidas</title>
		<link>http://www.groupsofwords.com/2008/05/31/officers-should-all-have-tanks-and-healers/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>kikidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 13:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.groupsofwords.com/?p=34#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Or better yet, roll a healer, a tank and a DPS. This way, you can be ultimately flexible (just call yourself Gumby) and fit any role your group needs. 

It helps if you have altisms disease (or altitis). :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or better yet, roll a healer, a tank and a DPS. This way, you can be ultimately flexible (just call yourself Gumby) and fit any role your group needs. </p>
<p>It helps if you have altisms disease (or altitis). :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.542 seconds -->
