Bad Guild Names

Many guilds have out­right ter­ri­ble names. Ok, not ter­ri­ble, just ter­ri­bly bland. They’re all stamped from the same lame press: X of Y.

  • Seek­ers of Truth
  • Cham­pi­ons of Honor
  • Seek­ers of Honor
  • Defend­ers of Glory
  • Cham­pi­ons of Truth
  • Seek­ers of Glory
  • Defend­ers of Truth
  • Cham­pi­ons of Glory
  • Defend­ers of Champions
  • Pro­tec­tors of Ital­ian Vir­gin­ity (kid­ding, this one would actu­ally be ok)

Tell me that you haven’t seen dozens of these guilds lin­ger­ing around. In my expe­ri­ence, they’re always recruit­ing. Their GM quotes Glad­i­a­tor or other epic movies in his sig. I can just keep pil­ing these stereo­types on, we’ve all seen peo­ple like this. They attach weight to the name of a group of people.

Next time I start a guild, I’m going to call my guild “X of Y”. Seriously.

The prob­lem with most joke names is that noth­ing is funny after two days. Just like most tat­toos aren’t cool in just a cou­ple of years. What’s cool and funny now is never cool the fifth time you explain it. How­ever, I sus­pect that as you see another guild form with a name like Har­bringers of Mis­for­tune, you might get another chuckle that will keep this joke fresh.

At least a guild with a stale joke name can be dis­banded and reformed with a newer joke name… unlike those sad souls stuck with tribal tattoos.

In the mean­time, I have an unguilded alt who’s about to start a new guild. It’ll be right up there with the Bankadins.

More Words!

This entry was posted in world of warcraft and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

5 Comments

  1. Posted April 24, 2008 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    There are some sub-flavors of this which bear mentioning.

    There’s the typo ver­sion: “Defn­ders of Truth” or “Swords of Jugement”.

    There’s the LoreLol ver­sions: “Jus­tice of Aze­roth” or “Defend­ers of Ironforge”.

    Obvi­ously you can com­bine these to great effect. Who wouldn’t want to join “Chaim­pons of Lorderan?”

    As for joke names, some of them never get old. I’ve always been a fan of the “Ven­dor” guilds (a guild name of “Staff Ven­dor” looks great under your name).

  2. Posted April 24, 2008 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    I agree com­pletely. I don’t know why, but it’s worse when the guild name is WoW-lore specific.

    I think the joke metaname that lore names lead to is a casual guild called “Obvi­ous Lore Deriv­a­tive” with its sis­ter raid­ing guild “Obscure Lore Derivative”.

  3. Posted April 28, 2008 at 12:29 am | Permalink

    Guilty as charged. I belong to a guild with the X of Y tem­plate. Excel­lent blog, by the way. I love the approach.

  4. Posted May 3, 2008 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    We also need a mora­to­rium on the words “Fire” “Knights” and “Dark” in guild names. I believe at one time my server had the guilds Dark Knights, Fire Knights and yes, Dark Knights of Fire all oper­a­tional at the same time.

  5. Posted July 18, 2008 at 7:43 am | Permalink

    Yeah I also belong to one– “Swords of the Arch Angel” (sic). It has a decent rep­u­ta­tion on the server though. I don’t mind the “lore” names per­son­ally, because on my server they’re rare enough and at least you get the impres­sion that this per­son sort of cares about the game.

    One day I’ll make a WoW ver­sion of an old LotGD clan I was in — Bunch of Incompetents!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>